Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now
Respond to the following in a minimum of 275 words:
Part 1: Many mediators often look at solving significant debates or social dilemmas by focusing on non-zero-sum games. (Make sure you have properly cited for each part.)
Part 1A: Define what a non-zero-sum game is.
Part 1B: Describe a large social dilemma in terms of a non-zero-sum game and how one would create a win-win scenario where both parties win.
Part 2: Group polarization is the phenomenon that occurs when a group engagement will enhance members’ preexisting tendencies and strengthening of the members’ average tendency. It is not about a split within the group. We have seen the effects of this within the last several elections within the United States.
Part 2C: Provide a relative example of this from recent events or from your workplace.
Part 2D: How do you overcome the negative effects of group polarization when there are very divided viewpoints on what’s right? (This part should have at least one citation.)
Part 2E: Should we continue to have national political debates during elections?
Part 2F: How would you recommend continuing the discussion or debate without the negative effects of group polarization? (This part should have at least one citation.)
Part 2G: Substantiate your opinion and include a supporting theory or concepts from the reading. (This part should have at least one citation.)
Part 3: There are many constraints in decision making. An ideal decision-making scenario rarely exists.
Part 3H: What criteria should one use to determine whether a decision-making process is of high quality or not? (This part should have at least one citation.)
Part 3I: Given all these criteria, which criterion do you believe is the hardest to achieve when trying to implement a significant social regulation that impacts the larger population (e.g., health care regulation change)?
Part 3J: Substantiate your opinion and include a supporting theory or concepts from the reading. (This part should have at least one citation.)
Part 4: Does power corrupt? Defend your answer. Provide a recent example in the news (properly cite the news article) that justifies your argument. Substantiate your opinion and include a supporting theory or concepts from the textbook. (This part should have at least one citation.)
